Aliens at the Eyes?
Douglas
Buchanan
Well in the science fiction sense of course
not. So having caught your attention I owe a word of explanation. Alien as term
catches the eye hence its use in the title but it is not a biological term for
it is not defined in either the Oxford Dictionary of Natural History,[1] nor the Dictionary of Birds[2]. However I am not entirely
alone in the use of the term as The Guardian referred to alien species in an
article about the cost of dealing with two of the species to be discussed
below, namely Giant Hogweed and Japanese Knotweed which are present at the site
of the 2012 Olympic games.[3]
So if not
Martians on the meadows what am I going to write about?
Well the Eyes are
made up of material dredged from the ship canal and inevitably this material
includes seeds and other viable vegetable matter. In addition to native plant
species there are number of non-native animal species causing problems or with
the potential to cause problems. In this article I will deal with three plant and
three animal species and briefly with a fourth.
A better term for
the plants and animals I am going to discuss is “Invasive Non-Native Species”. These
are defined in a Scottish Executive publication as “ …one that has been
transported outside of its natural range and that threatens environmental,
agricultural or economic resources.”
Non native
species are considered by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) to be one of the
primary threats to global biodiversity, second only to habitat destruction.
Because these
Non-natives have been transported by the agency of man outside their normal
habitat they are usually not subject to the checks of natural predators and
competitors so that they can dominate suitable habitats. At the same time they
can be a sterile environment for native wild life.
Invasive weeds
are not necessarily non-native. Native species can become invasive weeds in
disturbed or nutrient rich conditions.[4]
The lush growth of native species such 
Broad Leaved Willow Herb.
as Rosebay Willowherb (Chaemerion
angustifolium)[5],
Great Willowherb (Epilobium hirsutum) and Common Nettle (Urtica
dioica) on No 3 bed providing good evidence. Interestingly Rosebay Willow
herb was considered to be an uncommon species more often found in gardens until
the second half of the 19th Century.[6]
The spread of this plant was associated with the large scale soil disturbance
consequent on railway building in the mid 19th Century and later
forest clearance in WW1 and bomb sites in WW2.

Extensive patch of Rosebay Willowherb,
No 3 Bed.
Invasive Non-native plant species at the Eyes
It is not surprising that the Eyes are host
to the three commonest invasive non native species found in the UK. The site
has been built up over many years from dredging material from the upper Mersey
basin and this includes lots of viable seeds. In general the silt deposited
makes for a fertile soil as can be seen from the lush growth on No 3 bed. There
are however some areas of poor fertility for example a part of the North meadow
on No 3. These areas of poor soil are attributable to dredgings from the outlet
of the river Bollin which brings down sandy material from the Millstone grit of
the Pennines.
I will now
discuss the three important Invasive non-native plant species found at the
Eyes.
1. Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum)
This plant is widespread at the Eyes. A
large stand of the plant can be seen on No 2 bed from the north-bound
carriageway of the Thelwall Viaduct in summer and it is widely distributed on
No 4 bed. The plant like the others to be considered here was first brought to
the UK as an ornamental garden plant in this case in the 19th
century from its native Caucasus.[7]
It is a member of the family Umbelliferae of which there are a number of other
native members on the Eyes including Angelica archangelica. According
to Mabey Giant Hogweed was a curiosity attracting little attention until 1970
when numbers of children started attending accident departments with burns to
their lips hands and eyes. They had been using the stems as blowpipes and
“telescopes”.[8]
The effect of the irritant sap is made worse by sunlight for which the medical
term is photosensitisation. After the blisters heal the subject is left with
dark pigmentation which may persist for several years in more severe cases.[9] Clearly a plant to be avoided.

Giant Hogweed before flowering.
Giant Hogweed is a mono-carpic perennial.
It grows for several years, flowers once and dies. Each plant can produce up to
50,000 seeds. They can remain viable for up to 15 years. Control can be
achieved by spraying with glyphosate best done when the plants are relatively
young and fast growing. Cutting the flowering stems before they set seed is
also a method of control but repeat treatments over several years may be 
Colony of Giant Hogweed with seed heads.
No 4 bed.
needed to eliminate the plant.[10] Control operators need to use
effective protective clothing and equipment.
2. Himalayan Balsam (Impatiens glandulifera)
This is a relative of the well known Busy
Lizzie used in gardens and as a house plant (Cultivars of Impatiens
balsamina). Another garden introduction, this time from the Himalayas. It
is said to have been introduced to the UK in 1839 and by the end of the 19th
Century was widespread.[11]
It is found in all but the higher areas of the UK often forming dense stands in
its preferred habitat of damp soil beside streams and rivers. It is an annual
plant with an explosive seed head capable of projecting seed up to seven
metres.

Dense growth of Himalayan Balsam
seedlings. Entrance to No 3 bed.
At the Eyes the effect of seed spread can
be seen in springtime when suitable areas are covered in small seedlings most
of which fail to grow to the flowering stage because of intense intra-specific
competition. The dense stands of this plant effectively crowd out slower
growing native species and as it dies down quickly and completely in winter the
resultant bare earth does pose an erosion risk though I have not seen this at
the Eyes. On the plus side the flowers do seem to be an attractive source of
nectar for insects. The plant is widespread in the wetter areas of bed 3 in
particular.

Dense Growth of Himalayan Balsam. View
from South Bank of No 3.
Control measures are best designed to
prevent the plant flowering. This means an assault in early summer with a
weedkiller such as Glyphosate or 2,4-D amine. The former will kill all plants
in the sprayed area, not usually a problem as Himalayan Balsam tends to be a
monoculture. The latter will not kill grasses.[12]
Control can also
be achieved by regular mowing or strimming over a three year period, suggesting
that the seeds have limited viability. If cut too early, the plants produce
more flowering shoots and hence more seed.
3. Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica)
There are actually three species of
Knotweed naturalised in the UK. In addition to Japanese knotweed we are also
host to Giant Knotweed (Fallopia sachalinensis) and Hybrid Knotweed (Fallopia
x bohemica) a cross between Japanese and Giant Knotweed.[13] Japanese Knotweed is however
the most common and troublesome of the three. The plant was, like the two
species discussed above, brought into the UK as an ornamental. Interestingly
only female plants are found in the UK so all spread is by vegetative means but
the distribution over most of the UK except for land at higher altitudes
suggests that the lack of seed has been no barrier to its spread.
The plant is
rhizomatous and normally found in dense clumps. The rhizomes can spread seven
metres from the parent plant and penetrate to 7 metres deep. Of the three
species discussed it is most the likely to cause structural damage. It is a
known cause of commercially significant damage from its ability to break
through road surfaces and because of the high cost of eradication.[14] This plant is found at the
Eyes but not as commonly as Giant Hogweed and Himalayan Balsam. There is a good
example close to the second barrier beside the Ship canal.

Japanese Knotweed, beside second
barrier.
Control is difficult. Because of the risk
of transfer of vegetative material it is not permitted to remove material from
a site without a waste license and any material removed should be buried at
least 10 metres deep. Control by glyphosate is possible and best done when the
plants are 1.5m tall in August or September.
Invasive Non-native species not yet found at the Eyes
In recent years increasing concern has been
expressed about the harmful effects of non-native water plants becoming
naturalised in the UK. These include Australian Stonecrop (Crassula helmsii)
introduced as an oxygenating plant for ponds in 1927. It is found at over
1500 sites in the UK with a bias towards the south of England.[15] Given that the plant can be
propagated by the transfer of quite small fragments in mud, there would seem to
be a significant risk of its eventual appearance at the Eyes. The plant can
grow in conditions from mud to water 3 metres deep. It out-competes native
species.
Parrot’s Feather
(Myriophyllum aquaticum) was also introduced as a pond oxygenator in
1960 and is now found at 150 UK sites including a small number in the
Northwest. Only female plants are present in the UK.[16]
Floating
Pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides) was also brought to the UK as a pond and
aquarium plant. As yet it is present at only a few sites in the UK.[17] Control has proved
difficult.
Alien animals
Red-eared Terrapin (Trachemys scripta elegans)
At first sight it may seem strange that
this North American species is present at the Eyes but the photograph is
clearly an individual of this species. It has been reported that around 30,000
individuals of this species were imported annually into the UK from the new
world between 1975 and 1985.[18]
Interestingly their conservation status in the Americas is near-threatened.[19] The diagnostic feature of the
red stripe on the head is seen in the illustration below.
When bought as a
small specimen the terrapin is manageable in an aquarium but they can grow to
an animal of 2kg and 30cm in length. They have a good ability to escape from
pens and no doubt, some have been released by owners who cannot cope with them,
even though this is illegal. They can be environmentally damaging as they are
known to eat bird’s eggs and dragon fly larvae.[20] The WECG suspects that they may be a
predator affecting the breeding of water birds and our Black-necked Grebes (Podiceps
nigricollis) in particular.

Red-Eared Terrapin. No 3 Bed taken from
North West Hide. These animals seem to be shy. I have only seen them from a
distance. This photo taken at approximately x100 magnification using a
telescope and digital camera.
Fortunately their requirements for breeding
mean that even if a pair is present they will be unsuccessful. The eggs, which
are laid in sandy material and not incubated, require a temperature of 25
Celsius for sixty days to hatch. Here in Warrington we feel happy if we get
this temperature for just a few days! The British Chelonia Group is of the view
that this species of terrapin is unlikely to survive long in the UK. It is
thought that the wild environment of the UK provides a poor diet lacking in
Vitamin A coupled with the fact that terrapins do not eat at all when the
outside temperature drops below 16-18 degrees C. They also need to sunbathe to
synthesise vitamin D an essential factor in their absorption of Calcium for
their shell.[21]
This sunbathing habit makes it less difficult to detect them. As far as I am
aware only two specimens have been seen at the Eyes at any one time. They are
most likely to be seen on sunny summer days from the hide overlooking the North
West pool on No 3 bed from where the photo was taken.
American Mink (Mustela vision)
This relative of the European Mink (Mustela
lutreola) is now widespread in the UK following escapes from fur farms. The
latter species is now only found in Eastern Europe apart from a relict
population in Western France. Both are members of the weasel family. Mink are
found in aquatic habitats but having only partly webbed feet are not as aquatic
as otters and much smaller.[22]
The American Mink
is predatory on a wide range of animals. In the UK there is good evidence that
they are implicated in the serious decline in water vole (Arvicole terrestris)
populations and that they have had deleterious effects on seabird colonies on
the west coast of Scotland.[23]
In Eastern Europe they have by competition reduced populations of European
Mink. It is thought that there are now over 100,000 American Mink in the UK and
that eradication is not a practicable proposition. Local eradication is being
tried on Scottish Islands.
Mink do not
compete well with the larger otter. The gradual re-colonisation of English
waterways by otters is likely to help the recovery of the water vole population
as otters displace mink and are too large to pursue voles into their burrows.
At the Eyes it is likely that the mink known to be present represent a
predatory threat to breeding waterfowl. Control of mink populations is a part
of the Species Action Plan for the water vole in the UK and the North Mersey
Local Biodiversity Action Plan does include a species action plan for the water
vole.[24]
Several members
have seen mink at the site. In the light of the above evidence it is an agreed
policy of the WECG to control Mink by trapping and we have had some success.

This is the
last of eight mink trapped in the relatively short period between mid March and
the end of May 2007.
Ruddy Duck (Oxyura jamaicensis)

Ruddy Duck male.
The ruddy duck issue has divided the UK
birding community. While not afraid of controversy and strongly in favour of
open discussion of areas of disagreement I decided to leave the risk of
alienating readers until the near the end of this article.
Ruddy ducks are
natives of North America. They were brought to the UK in the 1930s for wildfowl
collections. It is documented that some young birds escaped from captivity in
1952 and the wild population has grown to over 6,000 pairs since then.[25]
The ruddy duck is
mainly a summer breeding visitor to the Eyes with small numbers over wintering
in mild winters. The Eyes still waters freeze quite quickly in cold weather
causing all duck to move to the river or away. Up to 41 birds were recorded in
June of 2004 but breeding was considered poor with only five broods being
found. These ducks breed late in the season and the poor weather in August 2004
may have been responsible for the apparently poor breeding success.[26]
There is no
evidence that the Ruddy duck causes any problem in the UK. However it is
national policy in accordance with a European Union directive to eradicate the
ruddy duck from the UK. This has the support of the RSPB and Wildfowl and Wetlands
Trust.[27] Why is
this so?
The difficulty
arises because of the precarious position of another member of the stifftail
family, the white-headed duck (Oxyura leucocephala). This species is the only
stifftail found naturally in Europe. Hunting and habitat degradation have
reduced its numbers in Europe by 90% to just about 10,000 individuals.[28] The Spanish population is
the immediate issue. This fell to just 22 individuals in 1977 and has now
recovered to 2,500. The recovery is however threatened by the ruddy duck which
has moved from the UK to Spain. Ruddy ducks interbreed with white-headed ducks
and as they are more competitive and can occupy a wider range of habitats they
could well completely absorb the white-headed population. For the Spanish
conservation authorities this would be as bad as the Red Kite disappearing from
the UK.[29] This
problem is not theoretical as an example from New Zealand demonstrates. In that
country the introduced Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) has largely absorbed the
indigenous Grey Duck (Anas superciliosa superciliosa) such that only about 20%
of the Mallard/Grey Duck population is now genetically pure Grey Duck.[30]
A detailed
discussion of the importance of interbreeding of the two species of
stifftails would take us into a number of highly technical issues such as what
is a species. I was brought up with the biological species concept. By this
speciation is defined by breeding behaviour.[31]
Using this concept O. jamaicensis and O. leucocephala would be one species and
there would be little reason for the fuss. However the biological species
concept no longer holds the roost. Modern authors accept that we are dealing
with two species of stifftail in Europe. It is really a case of watching and
waiting because the definition of species is currently in a state of flux due
to the introduction of DNA technology. My own view is that I find it hard to
accept that the environment would be much harmed by interbreeding of the two
stifftails in Europe but at the same time I sympathise with the Spanish
position and reluctantly go along with government policy. To my knowledge there
has been no attempt yet to cull the Ruddy Ducks at the Eyes.
Grey Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
Definitely an alien. According to some
authors the first grey squirrels were released in Henbury Park in Cheshire in
1876.[32]
It is well known that Grey Squirrels have been in part responsible for the
disappearance of the Red Squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris). Vulgaris being the
Latin word for common reminds us that this was the only UK squirrel prior to
1876.
Given the history
of the Eyes it is doubtful if Red Squirrels have ever been resident. Grey
Squirrels are seen but there is no evidence that they cause any damage on the
site so they will not be further discussed here. For more information look at http://www.jncc.gov/page-3224, http://www.yptenc.org.uk/docs/factsheets/animal_facts/grey_squirrel.html
http://www.wildlifetrust.org.uk/durham/RedAlert/RedSqUK.html
[2] Campbell and Lack (1985).
[3] The Guardian 20.09.05 (2005) p 8.
[4] Environment Agency (2003) p 3
[5] Chaemerion according to Streeter (1983) but Mabey (1996)
gives Chamerion.
[7] The date of introduction is variously given as early or late 19th
century. The Environment Agency publication is specific to the year 1893 but
Mabey cites evidence of its presence as early as 1835 in a Bayswater garden.
[9] Environment Agency (2003) p 10
[10] Environment Agency (2003) p 11
[12] Environment Agency (2003) P 12
[13] Environment Agency (2003) p 8
[14] Scottish Executive Website; Invasive Non-native Species consulted
19/08/05
[15] Environment Agency (2003) p 14
[16] Environment Agency (2003) p 16
[17] Environment Agency (2003) p 18
[21] British Chelonia group, ibid.
[22] Corbet G. and Ovenden D. (1980) p 181 and 184
[23] Centre for Conservation Science (2005)
[25] www.rspb.org.uk/policy/species/index.asp.
(2005). I am advised by David Norman the there is a detailed account of the
escape and spread of Ruddy ducks in Sir Christopher Lever's book The
Naturalized Animals of the British
Isles published by Hutchinson in 1977 (A new
edition came out last year). Lever's description is based on Robert Hudson's
paper in British Birds 69 132-143 (1976). The forward is written by Peter
Scott in which he says ‘Having been carelessly responsible myself for allowing
the North American Ruddy Duck to escape and build up to what seems to be a
small but viable population in England , I am in no position to pass judgement
on others. To be sure the Ruddy Duck is decorative and apparently harmless
but who knows what insidious effect it may have on the
ecological web. I really should not
have allowed them to fly out into the countryside - although they look
delightful in flight.’ Prophetic words indeed.
[31] Brooke M. and Birkhead T. (1991) p 83
|